Saturday, November 19, 2005

Defence Spending


When I wrote my season's preview in August, I suggested that Man Utd would have the best chance of challenging Chelsea largely due to their devastating strike pairing of Rooney and van Nistelrooy. Unfortunately whilst we played reasonably well in the second half, and scored a stunning equaliser, we were ultimately undone just a few minutes later by the link-up between two of the best strikers in the world. It could be argued that Rooney should have been stopped well before he got into our penalty box but he left the Dutchman with plenty to do with an opportunistic flicked pass, and the finish was absolutely breathtaking. Whilst the goal again showed up the inadequacies of Chris Powell these days, you had to applaud its brilliance even though it killed us off.

For the first 30 minutes or so we were totally outclassed with United moving the ball around like a pinball, but ironically the best chance of the game fell to Darren Bent (who looks worryingly quiet right now) who failed to find the net when El Karkouri's kick ricocheted into his path. However few could have denied United deserved the lead they took, again some slick passing found Smith via Fletcher, and I perhaps wasn't alone in thinking another 4-0 drubbing could be on the cards.

However, Curbs had a few words and most importantly made an early change, bringing on Thomas for the largely ineffective Rommedahl, which allowed Ambrose a freer role which he used devastatingly just a few seconds later driving home from 20 yards after some slick passing of our own. At this point, one felt the confidence generated by the equaliser may lead to a concerted push for a winner, but football has an unfortunate habit of dashing hopes, and it only took five minutes for United to score the winner. The final nail in the coffin came with five minutes left and for the second game running, some blame must be given to Andersen who got down too slowly.

The second half should give fans hope that we can pull out of this mini-slump relatively quickly, but I sense that there is something wrong with the balance of our defence, and we will remain vulnerable there until sorted. We have now conceded 17 goals in 12 games (more than Birmingham and Everton) and this should be cause for concern. I can't quite put my finger on the problem, but certainly Powell isnt good enough, and his replacement in recent weeks Spector looked uncertain in that position also. Against a side like United who tend to use brain rather than brawn to break teams down, I was surprised to see Perry on the bench, and he will have watched with a degree of schadenfraude as the back four was caught too square on more than one occasion in the first period. In short, we need a new left-back (assuming the Herminator remains in the centre) and we need to work out which centre-back pairing is the most effective. (by the way, what happened to Jon Fortune?)

Certainly the return of Ambrose to the side has given us a new attacking option, and it is disappointing to see him stranded on the left since he is clearly one of those players who can make things happen. Perhaps he is best suited in a free role as a deep-lying second striker with Curbs sacrificing one of the midfielders to play a narrower 4-4-1-1? Either way, three defeats on the spin and all those goals conceded suggest some sorts of changes either to personnel or formation at Villa, a ground where our record is shocking.

5 Comments:

At 9:55 AM, Blogger The Exile said...

I definitely agree with the 4-4-1-1 formation. Ambrose could do the job and it would off poor Darren Bent some well needed support up front.

 
At 12:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Think you're being a bit harsh on Powell. Yes, hes not the solution long term, but the defence looked much less exposed yesterday than with Spector in the same position. As for the goal, well given that he's a head shorter than Van Nistelroy ( who was leaning all over him as the cross came over) what exactly was he supposed to do?

 
At 11:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

if you put ambrose in the centre, you will immediately remove murphy's ability to influence a game. one of the reasons for his excellent form this season is that he has two defensive minded players immediately behind him. this gives him the freedom to express himself fully and the results have been clear for everyone to see. i'd like to see ambrose given a chance there but i don't think there's any way that he and murphy could play together in central midfield. perhaps if murhpy has to miss a few games it would be worth giving ambrose a go there.

 
At 1:18 PM, Blogger New York Addick said...

Fair point, but after one win in six League games and 13 goals conceded, it is time to consider changes to the formation and core group of players who have served us well up to this point.

 
At 3:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No reason Ambrose couldn't play ahead of Murphy, and the two of them interchange if following NY Addick's logic, in a 4-4-1-1 formation. May have to sacrifice Rommedahl in favour of a more all round midfielder though, ie one who can tackle.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home