Monday, March 20, 2006

Great Expectations

On the All Quiet in the East Stand blog, I argued that Charlton's lousy away support might be linked to the team being 'sh*t' right now, and was rightly castigated for it. With hindsight I regret using that rather inelegant adjective, and clearly even if it were valid, it would only be in a relative not an absolute sense.

However, one of the arguments put forward against my overly critical assessment of the Arsenal defeat is what I term the 'nostalgia argument' and is on the lines of 'ten years ago, you'd have given your right arm to have the problems we have today.' This is true of course, but also irrelevant in my view.

Expectations are by necessity dynamic not static. It is absolutely correct that Curbs and the board should be wholeheartedly congratulated on exceeding the low expectations the fans had in the early-1990s, through a combination of good coaching, a sensible transfer policy, a progressive community-oriented outlook and the ongoing setting of realistic goals. However the 'issue' that I have right now is whether the club has inadvertently set its ongoing expectations 'too low' which in itself may have unintended consequences, some of which are already in evidence.

I have argued before that the club was fortunate to have been going through its rebuilding process in the mid-1990s at precisely the time when the creation of the Premier League was going to lead to a number of clubs over-leveraging and burning themselves out (Leeds are obviously the best example). This was a coincidence of course, but it meant that Charlton effectively leapfrogged a whole series of clubs in terms of ongoing prospects etc.. in a far shorter period of time than would previously have been possible. As it happens it is now in Leeds' hands whether they win automatic promotion back to the top flight, but even if they achieve it, they will look up to Charlton on their return, not the other way around. This is an incredible reversal in fortunes.

I have also pointed out on previous posts that Charlton are now the 10th longest-serving team in the current Premiership, again testament to the calm stewardship of Curbs and the board, but again it serves to remind us that far from running the risk of setting our expectations 'too high', we may be doing the precise opposite. Given the crucial importance of Sky money, statistics like these are far more important gauges of a club's standing in the game than how many fans we take to away games.

I understand the board's conservative standpoint, I just don't happen to agree with it. They are determined that should relegation occur, the club would not be wiped out financially, but instead be in a position to bounce straight back as they did in 1999/2000. However I fear that they could end up causing the very outcome that they are so keen to avoid. Clearly there is a fine balance here, but our form since September 2005 and even as far back as January 2005 has been relegation form or thereabouts. Indeed without the 'Darren Bent miracle', I believe we would be in the mire right now.

I fear that the Jeffers/Murphy signings in the summer of 2004 signalled the Board's intentions to 'step up to the next level', but that their unfortunate outcomes have grounded their expectations back down to earth. In my view, the lesson from the Jeffers/Murphy saga is not that the Board was wrong to try to sign players of their calibre, but that we should not throw out all the usual criteria for transfers that have previously worked so well (like checking out their character for a start).

If the right new manager could be found, I believe the club would benefit from a fresh influx of ideas. Given that the club has implied Curbs has a job for life, there surely has to be some risk (however small) that he could be sacked otherwise he will surely never truly be giving 100% to the role. Having said that, Curbs is working within the constraints that the Board has imposed upon him and I've come round to the view that the problem lies higher up for the timebeing.

The club can't just stand still, focus solely on balancing the books and hope that form will revert to trend. The traits that served the club so admirably after the dark years away from the Valley may no longer be serving us well now. To use an utterly inappropriate analogy, those traits that helped build the post-war Japanese economy from oblivion to world power, were the same that helped push them headlong into a decade of deflationary bust.

Things are not that bad of course, but those fans who are able to undertake a dispassionate assessment of the club sense a worrying downward trend, now being evidenced by lower crowds. Football is an unusual industry of course, fans can choose to consume more or less Charlton, but they are highly unlikely to move their consumption of football to another provider. Hence, when fans begin to vote with their feet, the club should sit up and take notice rather than send out desperate letters from the manager demanding our support.

I am not asking for too much from the club. I would like to see a more ambitious transfer policy, including a more enlightened approach to foreign players. I would like to see a total shake-up of the youth system (with heads rolling) that has failed the club for too long now. And I would like to see the team play with a little bit more panache, and a little bit less concern for what might go wrong if they do so. Football is ultimately an instinctive sport and all players need some freedom to express themselves (leaving a player or even two up for a corner might be a start).

I will be there on Thursday night all being well and am excited about the opportunity which the gods of the FA Cup draw have handed us. Should we be knocked out, it would easy for me to return home and write a vitriolic blog, but the result of one game is too random to be meaningful. Similarly should we win, it is important that those fans who are willing to be critical (and to be denounced for doing so) don't allow the prospect of a Cup semi-final to paper over the cracks in the club's current posturing.

My Dad always reminds me that the relationship one has with their football club is unique. You can have more than one wife, more than one child, more than one job, more than one house and more than one car, but you can never truly have more than one football club. It's for this reason that I occasionally get impetuous about it, but at the end of the day I really care and want to see the club fulfil its potential, instead of wallowing in nostalgia.

6 Comments:

At 7:35 PM, Blogger Wyn Grant said...

Interesting as always and I like the analogy with Japan. But The Times (I think) recently argued that the problem at The Valley was the opposite to the one you state: Curbs had created unsustainable expectations at The Valley. I also think that your argument on All Quiet comments that attendances could drop to 17,000 - 18,000 is far fetched. There will always be a market for reasonably priced Premiership football in London. Fulham have even managed to attract 'neutral' fans. And United supporters from Surrey and Scousers from Hertfordshire will always take an opportunity to see their team.

 
At 9:06 PM, Blogger New York Addick said...

I suppose I'm agreeing with the Times article then, but arguing that if the fans have high (or at least much higher) expectations then it is a reasonable response to both our recent success and the very rapid decline of clubs that previously were our superiors.

Companies have to adapt and change otherwise they become stale and begin to decline (ultimately Charlton is a listed company, even if only a fool would invest in the hope of making money from it).

I recall Richard Murray saying a decade ago, "Can we become a Norwich or a QPR?", and in the case of QPR at least, not only have we matched them, the gap is now enormous.

As I said in the post, I understand the board's caution but they shouldn't be surprised if a few fans begin to lose a little interest because their new (higher) expectations are not being matched.

 
At 5:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

my concern is this "job for life" that murray and the rest seem to have bestowed on curbs.in my mind they appear in awe of his achievements and of course there hard to knock but blind to the lousey football we've been playing these past two seasons and completely overlooked his poor dealings-darren bent-aside in the transfer market and lets face it if it wasn't for d.bent we'd probably be in the mire and if things continue more than likely will be next season.i really do feel a shake up is essential if not curbs then at least the coaching staff because there definately not up to it.

 
At 1:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You say 'I would like to see a more ambitious transfer policy...' I presume this translates to spend more on 'big' players, but attracting big players with the right attitude to the club is difficult, I would say Murphy & Smertin were good 'big' signings but got better offers, and so there is a fine line. Rommedahl and Andersen are good examples of fairly big names who don't feel we are 'too small' for them.

 
At 2:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

..looking at our 6 month results just released we have lost 5m as a result of the boards 'deliberate decision to invest in the playing squad', so I don't think they can be accused of being overcautious by running the club at a rate of a 10m annual deficit. We just don't have the money. Trying to imply that we are the country's 10th biggest club is a nonsense. West Ham's (for example) financial clout will always exceed ours because they are a bigger business than us, with a bigger history and fanbase paying higher prices, regardless of the fact that they teetered close to the edge for a year or two. I agree that Curbs can come over a bit stodgy at times, but do we really want to submit ourselves to the lottery of finding one of the few individuals out there who could do as good or maybe a better job than him. The negativity is structural and is all over the Prem (just ask Boro or Bolton fans how 'exciting' their football is...). The one place that I do agree with you is on the lack of homegrown talent. I can't believe that our catchment area can only produce one good and a couple of average prem players over the last 5 yrs, and this needs to be addressed.

 
At 3:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.

Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

RickJ

 

Post a Comment

<< Home